Аннотация.

В статье проведен сравнительный анализ современных количественных методов выявления трендов развития S&T, используемых наряду с экспертными. Показано, что методы tech mining приоритетных тематик опираются на представление о науке как исследовательской деятельности. В качестве альтернативной методологии выделения приоритетных научно-технологических тематик предложена модель познавательной деятельности, основанная на процессе структуризации и представления реальности в виде «сетевого пространства». Рассмотрен case study применения предлагаемой методологии для онлайнового выявления трендов развития науки и технологии.

Ключевые слова:

научно-технологические тренды, tech mining, интеллектуальный анализ данных, науковедение, сетевая реальность.

Стр. 54-65.

Полная версия статьи в формате pdf. 

REFERENCES

1. Gvishiani G.M. Lisichkin V.A. Prognostika. M.: Znanie, 1968
2. Petrovsky A.B., Boychenko V. S., Sternin M. Yu., Shepelev G. I. Setting the priorities of scientific and technological development: the experience of foreign countries // Proceedings ISA RAS. v 65. 3, 13-26. 2015.
3. Forrester G. Industrialnaya dinamika M. Progress, 1971.
4. Meadows, Donella H., Dennis L. Meadows, Jorgen Randers, William W. Behrens III (1972). Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books
5. Gvishiani G.M. Methodoligical problem modelirovania globalnogo razvitiya, М. 1977.
6. Gelovani V.M., Britkov V.B., Dubovskiyi S.V. SSSR I Rossiya v globalnoyi sisteme (1985-2030): Rezultaty globalnogo modelirovaiya. M.: Knijnij dom «Librokom», 2009
7. Dubovskiyi S.V. Globalnoe modelirovaiya I prognozirovaije // Systems research. Methodological problems. Yearbook 2006-2007. V.: URSS, 2007, p. 22-33.
8. Stepin V. S. Nauchnoe poznanie I cennosti tehnogennoyi civilizacii // Voprosy filosofii, 1989, №10, p.3-18.
9. OECD (2014) OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014, OECD Publishing. Электронный ресурс: // http://www.oecd-ilibrary.
org/science-and-technology/oecd-sciencetechnology-and-industry-outlook-2014_sti_outlook-2014-en / доступ 29.01.2017
10. Kolesnikova T. V. Innovationnaya sostavlyushchaya kitayskoy ekonomiki // Ekomichesky Zhurnal. 2012, № 28, 31-40.
11. Malseva A. A. Klyuchevye ososbennosti razvitia innovacionnoy ekonomiki: «Kitayskoe chudo» //Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo univesiteta. Ekonomicheskii i yuridicheskii nauki. 2013, issue. 2 p.1,123-132.
12. Dubovskiyi S.V. Modelirovanije cyklov Kondratjeva I prognozirovanie krizisov // Kondratjevskie volny. Volgograd: Izd-vo «Uchitel», 2012б p. 179-188.
13. Dubovskiyi S.V. Prognozirovanie krizisov v ciklah Kondratjeva // Problemy teorii I praktiki upravlenija. 2016, №6, p.93-96 // available at:
http://www.socionauki.ru/book/files/k_waves/ volume_1/179-188.pdf; accessed 29.01.2017.
14. Sadovnichii V.A., Akaev A.A., Korotaev A.A., S.Yu. Malkov Kompleksnoe modelirovanie I prognozirovanie razvitiya stran BRICS v kontekste mirovoi dinamiki. M. Nauka., 2014.
15. Oral M., Kettani O., Lang P. (1991) A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects // Management Science. Vol. 37. No 7. Р. 871–885.
16. Xainz Karsten. Kak byt s innovatiami? Opyt Germany. // available at: http://www.pprog.ru/heinz.pdf. 29.07.2016 // web site: http://www.pprog.ru/
heinz.pdf / accessed 29.01.2017.
17. Jewell T. (2003) International foresight’s contribution to globalization // Foresight – The Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy. Vol. 5. No 2. P. 46–53.
18. Keiser R., Prange H. (2004) The reconfiguration of national innovation systems – the example of German biotechnology // Research Policy. Vol. 33. P. 395–408.
19. Koschatzky K., Sternberg R. (2000) R&D cooperation in innovation systems – some lessons from the European regional innovation survey //European Planning Studies. Vol. 8. No 4. P. 487–501.
20. Webster A. (1999) Technologies in transition, policies in transition: foresight in the risk society //Technovation. Vol. 19. No 6. P. 413–421.
21. Hubka V. Teoria tehnicheskih system. M. 1985.
22. Brummer V. Konnola T., Salo A. Forsayt-issledovanie-dlya-razrabotki-natsionalnyh-strategiy-finsayt-2015. 2009. Foresight v. 3. № 4, 56–65.
23. Gruber F., Degelsegger А. S&T Cooperation Foresight Europe – Southeast Asia. Foresight v. 4. № 3, 56–68.
24. Attila A. Evolving Foresight in a Small Transition Economy // Journal of Forecasting, 2003, v. 22, No 2–3. P. 179–201.
25. Cuhls K. From Forecasting to Foresight Processes – New Participative Foresight Activities in Germany // Journal of Forecasting, 2003, v. 22, No 2–3. P. 93–111.
26. Durand T. Twelve Lessons Drawn from ‘Key Technologies 2005’, the French Technology Foresight Exercise // Journal of Forecasting, 2003, v. 22, No 2–3. P. 161–177.
27. Keenan M. Identifying Emerging Generic Technologies at the National Level: the UK Experience // Journal of Forecasting, 2003, v. 22, No 2–3. P. 129–160.
28. Clark, J. and Guy, K. (1998) Innovation and competitiveness: A review, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10, 3. P. 363–395.
29. Salmenkaita J.-P. , Salo A. (2002) Rationales for government intervention in the commercialization of new technologies // Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. Vol. 14. No 2. P. 183–200.
30. Kuznetsova, Yu. M., Osipov G. S., Chudova N. V Intellectual analysis of scientific publications and the current state of science // Large-scale Systems
Control. Special issue 44: «Scientometric and expert methods in research management». 2013,106-138.
31. Britkov V.B., Bulyuchev A.V. Metodyu analysa bolshix ob`emov slabostructurirovannoy informatii // Informatsionnye tekhnologii i vychislitelnye sistemy”,ISSN 2071-8632// №1/2010, 36-44.
32. Mirskii E. M. Massive publikaciy i systema nauchnoi discipliny // Systems Research . Ежегодник. 1977, стр. 133-158.
33. Chernyavskaya V. E. Interpretatia nauchnogo teksta М.: «Librokom», 2010.
34. Chernyavskaya V. E. Kommunikatii v nauke: normativnoe i diviantnoe. М.: «Librokom», 2011.
35. Kuznetsova, Yu. M., Osipov G. S., Chudova N. V., Shvets A. V. Automatic assessment of article conformity to the standards for scientific publications// J. «Proceedings of ISA». – 2012. v. 62., № 3. – С. 132–138.
36. Kurakova N. G., Zinov V. G., Cvetkova L. A., Eremchenko O.A., Komarova N.G., Komarov A.V., Sorokina A. V., Pavlov P. N., Kocyubinskii V. A. Nacionalnaya nauchno-texnologickaya politika «bystrogo reagirovania»: rekomendatii dlya Rossii. Delo, М., 2014.
37. Bykova N. Nauchnuyu expertizu dovedut do avtomatisma // available at: http://www.strf.ru/
material.aspx?CatalogId=223&d_no=81544#.WI3lahTttqJ / accessed 29.01.2017.
38. Scientometric and expert methods in research management // Large-scale Systems Control. Special issue 44. М.: IPU RAS, 2013.
39. Douglas N. Arnold, Kristine K. Fowler. Nefarious Numbers / Электронный ресурс:/ http://arxiv.
org/pdf/1010.0278v4.pdf / доступ 29.01.2017.
40. Smirnov G.A. Poznanie i/ili struktizacia: k razrabotke systemnoi modeli znaniya // Systems Research. Methodological Problems. Yearbook 2003-2005. М.: Наука, 2006, P. 29-69.
41. Smirnov G.A., Tishchenko V. I. Principy setevyh formy poznania // Vyyavlenie prioritenyh napravlenii: interdisciplinary approach. М.: IMEMO RAS, 2016, 21-39.
42. Berners-Lee Tim, Hendler James and Lassila Ora. The Semantic Web // Scientific American: Feature Article: The Semantic Web: May 2001 // Электронный ресурс:: http://www.scientificamerican.
com/article/the-semantic-web/ доступ 29.01.2017.
43. Google Trends / Электронный ресурс: https:// ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Trends // доступ 29.01.2017
44. Kämpf M, Tessenow E, Kenett DY, Kantelhardt JW The Detection of Emerging Trends Using Wikipedia Traffic Data and Context Networks. PLoS ONE 2015,10 (12) / Электронный ресурс: http:// journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/ journal.pone.0141892 //доступ 29.01.2017
45. Hodson Hal Google Flu Trends gets it wrong three years running. New Scientist, 2014, 13 March / Электронный ресурс: https://www.newscientist.
com/article/dn25217-google-flu-trends-gets-itwrong- three-years-running / доступ 29. 01. 2017 / доступ 29.01.2017.
46. Keenan M. Identifying Emerging Generic Technologies at the National Level: the UK Experience // Journal of Forecasting, 2003, v. 22, No 2–3. P. 129–160.
47. Ramine Tinati, Thanassis Tiropanis, Leslie Carr. An Approach for Using Wikipedia to Measure the Flow of Trends Across Countries // WWW 2013 Companion, May 13–17, 2013, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. ACM 978-1-4503-2038-2/13/05 // доступен 30.05.2016
48. Lih A. «Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource». 5th International Symposium on Online Journalism // доступен 30.05.2016.
49. Tishchenko V. I. Method for detection and monitoring the dynamics of innovation trends using Wikipedia // Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence with International Participation (CAI 2016). Conference Proceedings. 2016. P.224-232
50. Poh K. L., Ang B. W., Bai F. (2001) A comparative analysis of R&D project evaluation methods // R&D Management. Vol. 31. No 1. P. 63–75.
51. Saaty T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.