Стр. 75-85.
Литература
1. Hanifan L.J. The rural school community center // The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1916. Vol.67(1). P. 130-138.
2. Bourdieu P. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Green wood. 1986.
3. Coleman J.S. Social capital in the creation of human capital //American journal of sociology. 1988. Vol.94. P. S95-S120.
4. Putnam R.D. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital // Journal of Democracy. 1995. Vol.6(1). P. 65-78.
5. Banfield E.C. The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. New York: Free Press. 1958. Р. 32
6. Granovetter M.S. The strength of weak ties // American journal of sociology. 1973. Vol.78(6). P. 1360-1380.
7. Quan-Haase A., Wellman B., Witte J.C., & Hampton K.N. Capitalizing on the Net. Social contact, civic engagement, and sense of community. In B. Welman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life. 2002. London: Blackwell.
8. Shah D.V., McLeod J.M., Yoon S.H. Communication, context, and community. An exploration of print, broadcast, and Internet influences. Communication Research, 2001.
9. Lin N. Social capital: A theory of social structure and social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2001.
10. Блок М., Головин Н.А. Социальный капитал: к обобщению понятия // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Социология. 2015. №4. С.99-111.
11. Рогозин Д.М. Перспективы развития теории социального капитала // Экономическая социология. 2023. №4. C.12-37.
12. Spottswood E.L., Wohn D.Y. Online social capital: recent trends in research // Current Opinion in Psychology. 2020. Vol.36. P. 147-152.
13. Katz J.E., Rice R.E. Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. 2002.
14. Wellman B., Boase J., Chen W. The networked nature of community: Online and offline. IT & Society. 2002. 1(1). P. 151–165.
15. Vergeer M., Pelzer B. Consequences of media and Internet use for offline and online network capital and well-being. A causal model approach // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2009. 15(1). P. 189-210.
16. Wellman B., Boase J., Chen W. The networked nature of community: Online and offline // IT & Society. 2002. 1(1). P. 151–165.
17. Payne G.T., Moore С.B, Griffis S.E., Autry C.W. Multilevel Challenges and Opportunities in Social Capital Research // Journal of Management. 2011. 37. P. 491.
18. Thelwall M. Introduction to webometrics. Quantitative web research for the social sciences. Chapel Hill: Morgan & Claypool. 2009.
19. McCallister L., Fischer C.S. A procedure for surveying personal networks // Sociological Methods & Research. 1978. Vol. 7(2). P. 131-148.
20. Lin N., Fu Y.C., Hsung R.M. Measurement techniques for investigations of social capital //Social capital: Theory and research. 2001. Vol. 4. P. 57-81.
21. Van Der Gaag M., Snijders T.A.B. The Resource Generator: social capital quantification with concrete items //Social networks. 2005. Vol. 27(1). P. 1-29.
22. Van der Gaag M., Webber M. Measurement of individual social capital: Questions, instruments, and measures //Social capital and health. New York, NY : Springer New York. 2008. P. 29-49.
23. Williams D. On and off the’Net: Scales for social capital in an online era // Journal of computer mediated communication. 2006. Vol.11(2). P.593-628.
24. Carlos Pinho J. The e-SOCAPIT scale: a multi-item instrument for measuring online social capital // Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing. 2013. Vol. 7(3). P. 216-235.
25. Marsden P.V. Egocentric and sociocentric measures of network centrality //Social networks. 2002. Vol.24(4). P. 407-422.
26. Burt R.S. Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. – Oxford university press. 2005.
27. Van Duijn, Marijtje A.J., and Mark Huisman. “Statistical Models for Ties and Actors.” In The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis // London, UK: Sage. 2011.
28. Krivitsky P.N., Morris M. Inference for Social Network Models from Egocentrically Sampled Data, with Application to Understanding Persistent Racial Disparities in HIV Prevalence in the US // The Annals of Applied Statistics. 2017. Vol. 11 (1). P. 427–55.
29. Park H.W., Jankowski N. A hyperlink network analysis of citizen blogs in South Korean politics. Javnost-The Public, 2008. P. 57-74.
30. Kim H., Kim G.J., Park H.W., Rice R.E. Configurations of relationships in different media:FtF, email, instant messenger, mobile phone, and SMS // Journal of Computer-Mediated communication. 2007. Vol.12. P. 1183-1207.
31. Turow J., Tsui L. The hyperlinked society. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 2008. P. 329.
32. Schmidt J. Blogging practices: An analytical framework // Journal of ComputerMediated Communication. 2007. Vol. 12. P. 1452-1471.
33. Park H.W., Thelwall M. Link analysis: Hyperlink patterns and social structure on politicians’ web sites in South Korea // Quality & Quantity. 2008. Vol. 42. P. 687–697.
34. Monge P.R., Contractor N.S. Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press. 2003. 49 p.
35. Doerfel M.L., Marsh P.S. Candidate-issue positioning in the context of presidential debates // Journal of Applied Communication Research. 2003. Vol. 31. P. 212-237.
36. Lim Y.S. Semantic web and contextual information: Semantic network analysis of online journalistic texts. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2011. P. 52-62.
37. Vergeer M., Lim Y.S., Park H.W. Mediated relations: New methods to study online social capital //Asian Journal of Communication. 2011. Vol. 21(5). P. 430-449.