Аннотация. В работе приводится системный анализ потенциала результатов целевой государственной научно-технической программы, который проведен с использованием методов группового многокритериального принятия решений. Выделен ряд дисфункций национальной инновационной системы России в области диффузии результатов государственных научно-технических программ. Сформулированы предложения по их смягчению. Ключевые слова: системный анализ, национальная инновационная система, дисфункция, диффузия научно-технических результатов, актор инновационной системы. Стр. 32-39. S. V. Pronichkin"The systems analysis of absorption capability of target state scientific and technical programs’ results"Abstract. The system analysis of absorption capability’s results of the program is performed with use of multicriterion group methods of decision-making. A number of dysfunctions of national innovative system of Russia in the field of diffusion of results of the state scientific and technical programs is allocated. Offers on their reduction are formulated. Keywords: system analysis, national innovative system, dysfunction, diffusion of scientific and technical results, actor of innovative system. Полная версия статьи в формате pdf. REFERENCES 1. Pronichkin S. V. Razrabotka kompetentnostnoy modeli eksperta dlya nezavisimoy otsenki obrazovatelnoy deyatelnosti vuzov // Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy, mezhvuzovskoy i institutskoy nauchno-tekhnicheskoy konferentsii «Dni nauki MISiS», 14–21 aprelya 2009 goda, GTU VPO «Moskovskiy institut stali i splavov «MISiS». M: MISiS, 2009. S. 399–400.
2. Larichev O. I. Verbalnyy analiz resheniy / Pod red. A. B. Petrovskogo. M.: Nauka. 2006, 286 s.
3. Petrovskiy A. B. Teoriya prinyatiya resheniy. M.: Izdatelskiy tsentr «Akademiya». 2009, 376 s.
4. Smith K. Innovation Infrastructures. Regional development and conditions for innovation in the network society, Geenhuizen G. (Ed.), Ind.: Purdue University Press, 2005. P. 17–34.
5. Watkins A., Papaioannou T., Mugwagwa J., Kale D. National innovation systems and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for innovation in developing countries. Research Policy. V. 44, 2015. P. 1407–1418.
6. Malerba F. Sectoral systems of innovation and production // Research Policy. Vol. 31, 2002. P. 247–264.
7. Golichenko O. G., Samovoleva S. A. Gosudarstvennaya politika v natsionalnoy innovatsionnoy sisteme: teoriya i praktika // Innovatsii. № 10 (192), 2014. C. 83–94.
8. Venkataraman R., Pinto J. Cost and Value Management in Projects. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2008, 348 p.
9. Arnold E. Evaluating Research and Innovation Policy: A Systems World Needs Systems Evaluations // Research Evaluation, Vol. 13, 2004. P. 3–17.
10. Pun H., Heese S. A note on budget allocation for market research and advertising // International Journal of Production Economics. V. 166, 2015. P. 85–89.
11. Jeroen P., Hippel E., Gault F, Kuusisto J., Raasch Ch. Market failure in the diffusion of consumer-developed innovations // Research Policy. V. 44, 2015. P. 1856–1865.
12. Wu Ing-Long, Chiu Mai-Lun. Organizational applications of IT innovation and firm’s competitive performance: A resource-based view and the innovation diffusion approach // Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. V. 35, 2015. P. 25–44.
13. Teece D. Forward Integration and Innovation: Transaction Costs and Beyond // Journal of Retailing. V. 86, 2010. P. 277–283.
14. Sayt InnoCentive Challenges. https://www.innocentive.com
15. Nematollahi O., Alamdari P., Assari M. Experimental investigation of a dual purpose solar heating system // Energy Conversion and Management. V. 78, 2014. P. 359–366.
16. Ferreira E., Antonio J. Optimization analysis of dual purpose systems // Desalination. V. 250, 2010. P. 936–944.
17. Wu Y., Welch E., Huang W-L. Commercialization of university inventions: Individual and institutional factors affecting licensing of university patents // Technovation. V. 36–37, 2015. P. 12–25.
18. Onishi K. The effects of compensation plans for employee inventions on R&D productivity: New evidence from Japanese panel data // Research Policy. V. 42, 2013. P. 367–378.
19. Promoting Entrepreneurship and Innovative SMEs in a Global Economy. OECD, Turkey, 2004, 44 p.
20. Sayt OECD. Research and Development Statistics. www. oecd.org
21. Barirani A., Beaudry C., Agard B. Distant recombination and the creation of basic inventions: An analysis of the diffusion of public and private sector nanotechnology patents in Canada // Technovation. V. 36, 2015. P. 39–52.
22. Parhankangas A., Ehrlich M. How entrepreneurs seduce business angels: An impression management approach // Journal of Business Venturing. V. 29, 2014. P. 543–564.
23. Kleer R. Government R&D subsidies as a signal for private investors // Research Policy. V. 39, 2010. P. 1361–1374.
24. Firth C. The disposition effect in the absence of taxes //Economics Letters. V. 136, 2015. P. 55–58.
25. Dyreng S., Lindsey B., Markle K., Shackelford D. The effect of tax and nontax country characteristics on the global equity supply chains of U. S. multinationals // Journal of Accounting and Economics. V. 59, 2015. P. 182–202.
26. Kang K. Asymmetries and Tariff-Tax Reforms in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation: A Quantitative Assessment // The Journal of Economic Asymmetries. V. 4, 2007. P. 89–97.
27. Wihantoro Y., Lowe A., Cooper S., Manochin M. Bureaucratic reform in post-Asian Crisis Indonesia // Critical Perspectives on Accounting. V. 31, 2015. P. 44–63.
|
