Methods and models in economy
Scientometrics and management science
V. I. Tishchenko System analysis of the methodology of the detection emerging trends in the science and the technology
Recognition of images
Methodological problems of the system analysis
V. I. Tishchenko System analysis of the methodology of the detection emerging trends in the science and the technology

Abstract:

The article presents a comparative analysis of modern quantitative methods to identify S&T trends, used along with the peer-review methods. It has been shown that the tech-mining methods are based on the idea of research activity. As an alternative methodology for selection of priority scientific and technological trends has been proposed a model of cognitive activity, based on the process of structuring and representation of reality in the form of “networked-space”. Case study of the proposed methodology for online identification of trends in the development of science and technology is analyzed.

Keywords:

scientific and technological trends, tech mining, semantic analysis of text, science of science, network reality

PP. 54-65.

REFERENCES

1. Gvishiani G.M. Lisichkin V.A. Prognostika. M.: Znanie, 1968
2. Petrovsky A.B., Boychenko V. S., Sternin M. Yu., Shepelev G. I. Setting the priorities of scientific and technological development: the experience of foreign countries // Proceedings ISA RAS. v 65. 3, 13-26. 2015.
3. Forrester G. Industrialnaya dinamika M. Progress, 1971.
4. Meadows, Donella H., Dennis L. Meadows, Jorgen Randers, William W. Behrens III (1972). Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books
5. Gvishiani G.M. Methodoligical problem modelirovania globalnogo razvitiya, М. 1977.
6. Gelovani V.M., Britkov V.B., Dubovskiyi S.V. SSSR I Rossiya v globalnoyi sisteme (1985-2030): Rezultaty globalnogo modelirovaiya. M.: Knijnij dom «Librokom», 2009
7. Dubovskiyi S.V. Globalnoe modelirovaiya I prognozirovaije // Systems research. Methodological problems. Yearbook 2006-2007. V.: URSS, 2007, p. 22-33.
8. Stepin V. S. Nauchnoe poznanie I cennosti tehnogennoyi civilizacii // Voprosy filosofii, 1989, №10, p.3-18.
9. OECD (2014) OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014, OECD Publishing. Электронный ресурс: // http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/oecd-sciencetechnology-and-industry-outlook-2014_sti_outlook-2014-en / доступ 29.01.2017
10. Kolesnikova T. V. Innovationnaya sostavlyushchaya kitayskoy ekonomiki // Ekomichesky Zhurnal. 2012, № 28, 31-40.
11. Malseva A. A. Klyuchevye ososbennosti razvitia innovacionnoy ekonomiki: «Kitayskoe chudo» //Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo univesiteta. Ekonomicheskii i yuridicheskii nauki. 2013, issue. 2 p.1,123-132.
12. Dubovskiyi S.V. Modelirovanije cyklov Kondratjeva I prognozirovanie krizisov // Kondratjevskie volny. Volgograd: Izd-vo «Uchitel», 2012б p. 179-188.
13. Dubovskiyi S.V. Prognozirovanie krizisov v ciklah Kondratjeva // Problemy teorii I praktiki upravlenija. 2016, №6, p.93-96 // available at: http://www.socionauki.ru/book/files/k_waves/volume_1/179-188.pdf; accessed 29.01.2017.
14. Sadovnichii V.A., Akaev A.A., Korotaev A.A., S.Yu. Malkov Kompleksnoe modelirovanie I prognozirovanie razvitiya stran BRICS v kontekste mirovoi dinamiki. M. Nauka., 2014.
15. Oral M., Kettani O., Lang P. (1991) A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects // Management Science. Vol. 37. No 7. Р. 871–885.
16. Xainz Karsten. Kak byt s innovatiami? Opyt Germany. // available at: http://www.pprog.ru/heinz.pdf. 29.07.2016 // web site: http://www.pprog.ru/heinz.pdf / accessed 29.01.2017.
17. Jewell T. (2003) International foresight’s contribution to globalization // Foresight – The Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy. Vol. 5. No 2. P. 46–53.
18. Keiser R., Prange H. (2004) The reconfiguration of national innovation systems – the example of German biotechnology // Research Policy. Vol. 33. P. 395–408.
19. Koschatzky K., Sternberg R. (2000) R&D cooperation in innovation systems – some lessons from the European regional innovation survey //European Planning Studies. Vol. 8. No 4. P. 487–501.
20. Webster A. (1999) Technologies in transition, policies in transition: foresight in the risk society //Technovation. Vol. 19. No 6. P. 413–421.
21. Hubka V. Teoria tehnicheskih system. M. 1985.
22. Brummer V. Konnola T., Salo A. Forsayt-issledovanie-dlya-razrabotki-natsionalnyh-strategiy-finsayt-2015. 2009. Foresight v. 3. № 4, 56–65.
23. Gruber F., Degelsegger А. S&T Cooperation Foresight Europe – Southeast Asia. Foresight v. 4. № 3, 56–68.
24. Attila A. Evolving Foresight in a Small Transition Economy // Journal of Forecasting, 2003, v. 22, No 2–3. P. 179–201.
25. Cuhls K. From Forecasting to Foresight Processes – New Participative Foresight Activities in Germany // Journal of Forecasting, 2003, v. 22, No 2–3. P. 93–111.
26. Durand T. Twelve Lessons Drawn from ‘Key Technologies 2005’, the French Technology Foresight Exercise // Journal of Forecasting, 2003, v. 22, No 2–3. P. 161–177.
27. Keenan M. Identifying Emerging Generic Technologies at the National Level: the UK Experience // Journal of Forecasting, 2003, v. 22, No 2–3. P. 129–160.
28. Clark, J. and Guy, K. (1998) Innovation and competitiveness: A review, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10, 3. P. 363–395.
29. Salmenkaita J.-P. , Salo A. (2002) Rationales for government intervention in the commercialization of new technologies // Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. Vol. 14. No 2. P. 183–200.
30. Kuznetsova, Yu. M., Osipov G. S., Chudova N. V Intellectual analysis of scientific publications and the current state of science // Large-scale Systems Control. Special issue 44: «Scientometric and expert methods in research management». 2013,106-138.
31. Britkov V.B., Bulyuchev A.V. Metodyu analysa bolshix ob`emov slabostructurirovannoy informatii // Informatsionnye tekhnologii i vychislitelnye sistemy”,ISSN 2071-8632// №1/2010, 36-44.
32. Mirskii E. M. Massive publikaciy i systema nauchnoi discipliny // Systems Research . Ежегодник. 1977, стр. 133-158.
33. Chernyavskaya V. E. Interpretatia nauchnogo teksta М.: «Librokom», 2010.
34. Chernyavskaya V. E. Kommunikatii v nauke: normativnoe i diviantnoe. М.: «Librokom», 2011.
35. Kuznetsova, Yu. M., Osipov G. S., Chudova N.V., Shvets A. V. Automatic assessment of article conformity to the standards for scientific publications//J. «Proceedings of ISA». – 2012. v. 62., № 3. – С. 132–138.
36. Kurakova N. G., Zinov V. G., Cvetkova L. A., Eremchenko O.A., Komarova N.G., Komarov A.V., Sorokina A. V., Pavlov P. N., Kocyubinskii V. A. Nacionalnaya nauchno-texnologickaya politika «bystrogo reagirovania»: rekomendatii dlya Rossii. Delo, М., 2014.
37. Bykova N. Nauchnuyu expertizu dovedut do avtomatisma // available at:
http://www.strf.ru/material.aspx?CatalogId=223&d_no=81544#.WI3lahTttqJ / accessed 29.01.2017.
38. Scientometric and expert methods in research management // Large-scale Systems Control. Special issue 44. М.: IPU RAS, 2013.
39. Douglas N. Arnold, Kristine K. Fowler. Nefarious Numbers / Электронный ресурс:/ http://arxiv.org/pdf/1010.0278v4.pdf / доступ 29.01.2017.
40. Smirnov G.A. Poznanie i/ili struktizacia: k razrabotke systemnoi modeli znaniya // Systems Research. Methodological Problems. Yearbook 2003-2005. М.: Наука, 2006, P. 29-69.
41. Smirnov G.A., Tishchenko V. I. Principy setevyh formy poznania // Vyyavlenie prioritenyh napravlenii: interdisciplinary approach. М.: IMEMO RAS, 2016, 21-39.
42. Berners-Lee Tim, Hendler James and Lassila Ora. The Semantic Web // Scientific American: Feature Article: The Semantic Web: May 2001
// Электронный ресурс:: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-semantic-web/ доступ 29.01.2017.
43. Google Trends / Электронный ресурс: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Trends // доступ 29.01.2017
44. Kampf M, Tessenow E, Kenett DY, Kantelhardt JW The Detection of Emerging Trends Using Wikipedia Traffic Data and Context Networks. PLoS ONE 2015,10 (12) / Электронный ресурс:
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0141892 //доступ 29.01.2017
45. Hodson Hal Google Flu Trends gets it wrong three years running. New Scientist, 2014, 13 March /Электронный ресурс: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn25217-google-flu-trends-gets-itwrong-three-years-running / доступ 29. 01. 2017 / доступ 29.01.2017.
46. Keenan M. Identifying Emerging Generic Technologies at the National Level: the UK Experience // Journal of Forecasting, 2003, v. 22, No 2–3. P. 129–160.
47. Ramine Tinati, Thanassis Tiropanis, Leslie Carr. An Approach for Using Wikipedia to Measure the Flow of Trends Across Countries // WWW 2013
Companion, May 13–17, 2013, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. ACM 978-1-4503-2038-2/13/05 // доступен 30.05.2016
48. Lih A. «Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource». 5th International Symposium on Online Journalism // доступен 30.05.2016.
49. Tishchenko V. I. Method for detection and monitoring the dynamics of innovation trends using Wikipedia // Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence with International Participation (CAI 2016). Conference Proceedings. 2016. P.224-232
50. Poh K. L., Ang B. W., Bai F. (2001) A comparative analysis of R&D project evaluation methods // R&D Management. Vol. 31. No 1. P. 63–75.
51. Saaty T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

 

 

2019-69-4
2019-69-3
2019-69-2
2019-69-1

© ФИЦ ИУ РАН 2008-2018. Создание сайта "РосИнтернет технологии".