Abstract.

Prioritization of the development of scientific research in healthcare and medicine is aimed at achieving a rational balance that ensures the maximum consideration of public interests. The formulated general principles for the formation of scientific priorities need in a systematic analysis of the established approaches to their determination. The paper studies the methods and criteria used to determinate priorities of medical research in foreign countries. The possibilities and limitations of existing approaches have been identified taking into account their impact on the scientific and technical policy and practice of healthcare.

Keywords:

healthcare, medicine, scientific priorities, decision making.

PP. 68-79.

DOI: 10.14357/20790279190306

References

1. Arevian A., Hora J., Jones F. et al. Participatory Technology Development to Enhance Community Resilience // Ethnicity & Disease. 2018. Vol.28. P.493-502.
2. Donaldson M., Sox H. Setting Priorities for Health Technology Assessment. - Washington: National Academies Press, 1992, 162 p.
3. Mitton C., Donaldson C. Health care priority setting: principles, practice and challenges // Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 2004. Vol.2. P.21-28.
4. Gurusamy K., Walmsley M., Davidson B. et al. Top research priorities in liver and gallbladder disorders in the UK // British Medical Journal. 2019. Vol.9. P.11-20.
5. Reed J., Howe C., Doyle C. et al. Successful Healthcare Improvements From Translating Evidence in complex systems: simple rules to guide practice and research // International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2019. Vol.31. P.238-244.
6. Bratarchuk T.V., Zakayeva D.K. Prioritety gosudarstvennoy politiki v zdravookhranenii [Priorities of public policy in healthcare] // Munitsipal’naya akademiya. 2017. №4. P.76-84.
7. Collins F. NIH Biennial Report. - Bethesda: NIH Press, 2018, 493 p.
8. Whicher D., Rosengren K., Siddiqi S. et al. The future of health services research. - Washington: NAM Press, 2018, 125 p.
9. Hewitt T. Evaluation of partnership funding opportunities. - Ottawa: SSHRC Press, 2018, 151 p.
10. Stevenson R., Clossson T. Accelerating innovation. - Ottawa: CFHI Press, 2018, 60 p.
11. Gran M., Stevens S. NHS Annual Report. - Leeds: NHS Press, 2018, 192 p.
12. Lyddiard J. NIHR Annual Report. - Liverpool: NIHR Press, 2018, 51 p.
13. Boney O., Bell M., Bell N. et al. Identifying research priorities in Anesthesia and Perioperative Care // British Medical Journal. 2015. Vol.5. P.32-42.
14. Chalmers I., Atkinson P., Badenoch D. et al. The James Lind Initiative: books, websites and databases to promote critical thinking about treatment claims // Research Involvement and Engagement. 2019. Vol.4. P.5-19.
15. McLaughlin C. NHMRC’s Research Quality Strategy. - Canberra: NHMRC Press, 2018, 81 p.
16. Donoghue L. Lowitja Institute Annual Report. - Melbourne: Lowitja Institute Press, 2018, 52 p.
17. Zorbas H. Cancer Australia’s Reconciliation Action Plan for 2019 to 2021. - Sydney: CA Press, 2019, 119 p.
18. Liddy C., Bello A., Cook J. et al. Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: cross-sectional analysis // British Medical Journal. 2019. Vol.30. P.28-38.
19. Wutzke S., Redman S., Bauman A. et al. A new model of collaborative research: experiences from one of Australia’s NHMRC Partnership Centres for Better Health // Public Health Research and Practice. 2017. Vol.27. P.27-35.
20. Anderson I., Robson B., Connolly M. et al. Indigenous and tribal peoples’ health: a population study // Lancet. 2016. Vol.9. P.131-157.
21. Holt J. Patient Experience in Primary Care // Journal of Patient Experience. 2019. Vol.6. P.93-102.
22. Stark Z., Nisselle A., McClaren B. et al. Attitudes of Australian health professionals towards rapid genomic testing in neonatal and pediatric intensive care // European Journal of Human Genetics. 2019. Vol.31. P.13-27.
23. Howarth E., Vainre M., Humphrey A. et al. Delphi study to identify key features of community-based child and adolescent mental health services in the East of England // British Medical Journal. 2019. Vol.19. P.29-36.
24. Buckley D., Ansari M., Butler M. et al. The Refinement of Topics for Systematic Reviews: Lessons and Recommendations from the Effective Health Care Program. - Rockville: NHS Press, 2013, 74 p.
25. Oliver N., Holt R. The James Lind Alliance research priorities for diabetes // Diabetic Medicine. 2019. Vol.36. P.267-278.
26. Schultz R., Abbott T., Yamaguchi J. et al. Injury prevention through employment as a priority for wellbeing among Aboriginal people in remote Australia // Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 2018. Vol.29. P.183-188.
27. Opie C., Gibson B., Lees C. et al. A rural Australian health service learns how to build strong employment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: a qualitative study // Human Resources for Health. 2019. Vol.17. P.44-56.
28. Guest J., Fuller G., Vowden P. Diabetic foot ulcer management in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes // International Wound Journal. 2018. Vol.15. P.43-52.
29. Hughes D., Doheny S. Constructing exceptionality: a neglected aspect of NHS rationing // Sociology of Health & Illness. 2019. Vol.20. P.96-104.
30. Morley H., Lotto R. An exploration of student nurses’ views of oral health care in the hospitalised child // Nurse Education in Practice. 2019. Vol.38. P.79-87.
31. Akyol M., Alden T., Amartino H. et al. Recommendations for the management of MPS IVA: systematic evidence- and consensus-based guidance // Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2019. Vol.14. P.137-149.
32. Majeed R., McPhee M., McAteer H. et al. The top ten research priorities for psoriasis in the UK // British Journal of Dermatology. 2019. Vol.4. P.129-137.
33. Larichev O.I. Verbal’niy analiz resheniy [Verbal Decision Analysis]. – M.: Nauka, 2006, 181 p.
34. Petrovsky A.B. Teoriya prinyatiya resheniy [Theory of Decision Making]. – M.: Izdatel’skiy tsentr «Akademiya», 2009, 400 p.