Community informatics and the formation of social networking
Computer analysis of texts
J.M. Kuznetsova Scenarial Approach to the Analysis of Texts
Information Technology
Systemic regulation of national and regional economy
Risk management and safety
J.M. Kuznetsova Scenarial Approach to the Analysis of Texts

Abstract.

The article provides a review of Russian linguists’ investigations applying the concept of scenario as a category of analysis. The general ideas about the scenario in cognitive science are considered. Three principal variants of the scenario approach to the analysis of texts are revealed. The first variant is aimed at the extraction from text of the explicit script as a kind of guidance by using the lexical markers of actions and their sequence. The second (communicative) variant implies the reconstruction of the scenario based on the markers of the communicative actions and the roles of participants. The third (semiotic) one based on the actualization of background knowledge correlated with the meaning of verbal signs entering into the text. The review indicated some possibilities of applying the scenario approach to text research that can be useful for developing ideas about the organization of human mental activity and their realization in a some forms of intellectual research and agent systems as components of the contemporary sociotechnical environment.

Keywords:

modeling of consciousness, behavior scenario, text analysis, speech behavior

pp. 31-41

References

1. Baranov, A.N. 2001. Vvedeniye v prikladnuyu lingvistiku (Introduction to applied linguistics). Moscow: Editorial URSS. 360 p.
2. Boldyrev, N.N. 2001. Kognitivnaya semantika (Cognitive semantics). Tambov: TGU. 123 p.
3. Van Ventszya. 2017. Kul’turnyy stsenariy «Supruzheskaya ssora» v zerkale russkikh paremiy (The cultural script “The Matrimonial Quarrel” in the Mirror of Russian Paremias) // Nauchnyy dialog (Scientific Dialogue) 1: 22-34.
4. Vezhbitskaya A. 1999. Semanticheskiye universalii i opisaniye yazykov (Semantic universals and description of languages). Moscow: «Yazyki russkoy kul’tury». 791 p.
5. Vinogradova L.N. 2001. «Nova mlada» v novoy sem’ye: poslesvadebnyy stsenariy (“Nova Mlada” in a new family: a post-wedding scenario) // Homo Balcanicus. Povedencheskiye stsenarii i kul’turnyye roli. Antichnost’. Srednevekov’ye. Novoye vremya (Homo Balcanicus. Behavioral scenarios and cultural
roles. Antiquity. Middle Ages. New time). Moscow: Institut slavyanovedeniya RAN. (Balkanskiye chteniya 6. Tezisy i materialy): 104-107.
6. Volkova A.Ya. 2013. Fenomen khamstva v destruktivnom obshchenii (Phenomenon of rudeness in destructive dialogue) // Vestnik LGU im. A.S.Pushkina. 4: 215-221.
7. Glazkova S.N. 2013. Natsional’no-kul’turnaya spetsifika russkogo direktiva (National and cultural specifics of the Russian directive). PhD Diss. Ekaterinburg. 375 p.
8. Golev N.D., Lebedeva N.B. 2000. Rechevoy zhanr ssory i konfliktnyye stsenarii (na materiale rasskazov V.M.Shukshina (Speech genre quarrels and conflict scenarios (on the material of the stories of V.M. Shukshin) // Jurislingvistika. 2: 158-171.
9. Drambyan M.I. 2006. Obychai primireniya v traditsionnoy kul’ture chernogortsev (The customs of reconciliation in the traditional culture of Montenegrins) // Agressiya i mirnoye sosushchestvovaniye: universal’nyye mekhanizmy kontrolya sotsial’noy napryazhennosti u cheloveka (Aggression and peaceful coexistence: universal mechanisms for controlling social tension in humans). Moscow: Nauchnyy mir: 258-270.
10. Kolkova N.A. 2009. Geshtal’ty i freymy svatovstva v russkoy frazeologii (Gestalts and frames of matchmaking in Russian phraseology) // Vestnik CHGPU. 1: 268-277.
11. Koshelev A.D. 2015. Kognitivnyy analiz obshchechelovecheskikh kontseptov (Cognitive analysis of universal concepts). Moscow: Rukopisnyye pamyatniki Drevney Rusi. 280 p.
12. Kustova G.I. 2004. Tipy proizvodnykh znacheniy i mekhanizmy yazykovogo rasshireniya (Types of derived mefnings and mechanisms of language expansion). Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury. 472 p.
13. Lakina N.Yu. 2013. K voprosu o sootnoshenii semanticheskikh i sotsial’nykh roley priglagol’nykh aktantov (To the question of the relationship between the semantic and social roles of the inverse actants) // Vestnik Baltiyskogo federal’nogo universiteta im. I.Kanta. 2: 127-134.
14. Lakoff J. 2004. Zhenshchiny, ogon’ i opasnyye veshchi: Chto kategorii yazyka govoryat nam o myshlenii (Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What are the categories of language speak on thinking). Moscow: «Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury». 792 p.
15. Leont’yev A.A. 1969. Yazyk, rech’, rechevaya deyatel’nost’ (Language, speech, speech activity). Moscow: «Prosveshcheniye». 214 p.
16. Leont’yev A.N. 1983. Izbrannyye psikhologicheskiye proizvedeniya: V 2-kh t. T. II (Selected psychological works: In 2 volumes, vol. II). Moscow: Pedagogika. 320 p.
17. Lurie S.V. 2017. Kul’tura i yeye stsenariy. Implitsitnyy obobshchennyy stsenariy kak vnutrikul’turnyy integrator (Culture and its script. Implicit generalized scenario as an intracultural integrator) // Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’. 2: 153-164.
18. Minskiy M. 1979. Freymy dlya predstavleniya znaniy (Frames for representation of knowledge). Moscow: Energiya. 151 p.
19. Murashova L.P. 2014. Kontseptual’nokognitivnyy freym (Conceptual-cognitive frame) // Nauchnyy vestnik YUIM. 4: 40-44.
20. Neklyudov S.Yu. 2013. «Durnoy obychay»: priznavayemyye pravila i real’naya praktika v narodnoy kul’ture (“Bad custom”: recognized rules and real practice in popular culture) // Zapretnoye / dopuskayemoye / predpisannoye v fol’klore (Forbidden / tolerated / prescribed in folklore). Moscow: RGGU: 77-173.
21. Nikitina Ye.S. 2016. Smyslovoy analiz teksta: Psikhosemioticheskiy podkhod (Semantic analysis of the text: Psychosemiotic approach). Moscow: LENAND. 200 p.
22. Osipov G.S., Panov A.I., Chudova N.V., Kuznetsova J.M. 2017. Znakovaya kartina mira sub”yekta povedeniya (A sign world model of the subject of behavior). Moscow: Fizmatlit. 318 p.
23. Plotnikova A.M. 2005. Kognitivnyye aspekty izucheniya semantiki (na materiale russkikh glagolov) (Cognitive aspects of the study of semantics (on the material of Russian verbs)). Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta. 140 p.
24. Plotnikova A.M. 2009. Kognitivnyye stsenarii glagolov povedeniya (na materiale russkogo yazyka) (Cognitive scenarios of verbs of behavior (on the material of the Russian language)) // Vestnik YuUrGU. 2: 48-50.
25. Polatovskaya O.S. 2013. Kognitivnyy analiz freyma-stsenariya «diskreditatsiya» (na materiale vystupleniy amerikanskikh politicheskikh deyateley po situatsii v Sirii) (Cognitive analysis of the frame-script “discrediting” (based on the speeches of American politicians on the situation in Syria)) // Vestnik OGU. 11(160): 106-110.
26. Raspopov I.P. 1981. Neskol’ko zamechaniy o tak nazyvayemoy semanticheskoy strukture predlozheniya (A few remarks on the so-called semantic structure of the sentence) // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 4: 24-34.
27. Saburova N.A., Mozdon I.I. 2012. Fenomen stsenarnosti angloyazychnogo reklamnogo teksta (The phenomenon of the scriptuality of the English-language advertising text) // Vestnik TOGU. 3(26): 229-238.
28. Tret’yakova V.S. Kognitivnyy aspekt opisaniya obshcheniya: teoriya stsenariya i stsenariy rechevogo povedeniya (Cognitive aspect of the description of communication: script theory and the script of speech behavior) // Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268405677 (accessed December 7, 2017).
29. Tret’yakova V.S. 2004. Rechevoy konflikt i aspekty yego izucheniya (Speech conflict and aspects of its study) // Jrislingvistika-5: Yuridicheskiye aspekty
yazyka i lingvisticheskiye aspekty prava (Legal aspects of language and linguistic aspects of law). Altay: Izd-vo Altayskogo gos. un-ta: 112-120.
30. Furer O.V. 2015. Modeli leksicheskogo znacheniya v otechestvennoy i zarubezhnoy lingvistike (Models of lexical significance in domestic and foreign linguistics) // Povolzhskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik. 2(7): 67-69.
31. Khristoforova O.B. 1998. Logika tolkovaniy: Fol’klor i modelirovaniye povedeniya v arkhaicheskikh kul’turakh (The logic of interpretation: Folklore and behavior modeling in archaic cultures). Moscow: Rossiysk. gos. gumanit. un-t. 80 p.
32. Cherednikova M.P. Ustnyye rasskazy v meditsinskoy subkul’ture (Oral stories in the medical subculture) // Available at: http://www. ruthenia.ru/folklore/cherednikova3.htm (accessed December 5, 2017).
33. Shalina I.V. 2009. Kul’turnyy stsenariy «Zhizn’ v derevenskoy sem’ye»: iz opyta lingvokul’turologicheskoy interpretatsii (Cultural scenario “Life in a village family”: from the experience of linguoculturological interpretation) // Vestn. Tom. gos. un-ta. 320: 31-37.
34. Shlyakhov V.I. 2007. Stsenarii russkogo rechevogo vzaimodeystviya (Scenarios of Russian speech interaction). Moscow. 280 p.
35. Shumov K.E. Traditsii pozharnoy okhrany: Zhargonizmy i professional’naya leksika (Traditions of fire protection: Jargonisms and professional vocabulary) // Available at: http://www.ruthenia.ru/folklore/shumov2.htm (accessed December 12, 2017).

 

 

2024-74-3
2024-74-2
2024-74-1
2023-73-4

© ФИЦ ИУ РАН 2008-2018. Создание сайта "РосИнтернет технологии".