Abstract.

Proposed methodology of infrastructure technology modeling is analyzed with regard to updated views of natural monopolies in Russian legislation. There are revealed the directions of legislative initiatives and changes to determine the possibilities on incorporation the potential set of theoretic-applied foundations in the state regulation procedures. It is connected to synthesis of the models of natural monopoly theory, optimization models of nonlinear physical networks development (extra-urban transport networks, electricity network, engineer’s infrastructural network, etc.) and also evaluation investment projects technique. On the basis of synthesis of the models it is formed the approach to adequate assessments of parameters of network infrastructure technologies and diagnostics of natural monopoly properties. To identify some subsystem of infrastructure as natural monopoly the computer experiments fulfilled. The experiments are oriented to testing subadditivity of multiproduct cost functions with using technological determinants, that is natural monopoly activity indicators. Number of results of experimental model calculations is given, first of all the impact assessment of investment component to economic characteristics of infrastructure technologies. Table and graphic illustrations are represented as well as analytical assessments.

Keywords:

natural monopolies, infrastructure technologies, synthesis of approaches, natural monopoly theory, technological determinants/natural monopoly activity indicators, multiproduct total cost function, testing on subadditivity, optimization of transport networks development, modeling of infrastructure technology parameters, diagnostics of natural monopoly properties

PP. 17-27.

DOI: 10.14357/20790279190302

References

1. O estestvennyh monopoliyah: Federal’nyj zakon RF ot 17.08.1995, №147-FZ (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami).
2. Belousova N.I. Ob izmenenii ramok gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya estestvennyh monopolij i klyuchevyh napravleniyah cenovoj ocenki // Finansovaya ekonomika. 2018. №7(11). S.1294-1297.
3. Sejchas ih chetyrnadcat’, ostanetsya vosem’. Zam. glavy FAS Sergej Puzyrevskij o reforme regulirovaniya gosmonopolij // Kommersant. №56 ot 01.04.2019. S.2.
4. O zashchite konkurencii: Federal’nyj zakon RF ot 26.07.2006, №135-FZ (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami).
5. Ob osnovah gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya cen (tarifov): proekt Federal’nogo zakona. Podgotovlen FAS Rossii (ne vnesen v GD FS RF, tekst po sostoyaniyu na 20.07.2018). Konsul’tantPlyus.
6. Ob osnovah gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya cen (tarifov): proekt Federal’nogo zakona. Podgotovlen FAS Rossii (aktual’nyj na 22.01.2019). fas.gov.ru.
7. Baumol W.L., Panzar J.C., Willig R.D. Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. N.Y.: HBJ. 1982. 497 r.
8. Belousova N.I., Vasil’eva Е.M. Voprosy teorii gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya i identifikacii estestvennyh monopolij. M.: KomKniga, 2006. 320 s.
9. Belousova N.I. Praktika provedeniya reform i teoreticheskie modeli gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya estestvennyh monopolij. M.: Knizhnyj dom «LIBROKOM», 2008. 112 s.
10. Vasil’eva Е.M. Formirovanie ocenok effektivnosti estestvenno-monopol’nyh proizvodstvennyh sistem. M.: Knizhnyj dom «LIBROKOM», 2008. 176 s.
11. Belousova N.I., Vasil’eva Е.M., Livshic V.N. Modeli identifikacii estestvennyh monopolij i gosudarstvennogo upravleniya imi (vozmozhnosti rasshireniya klassicheskoj teorii) // Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody. 2012. T.48. №3. S.64-78.
12. Belousova N.I., Vasil’eva Е.M. Еstestvennomonopol› nye indikatory deyatel’nosti: teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty analiza // Trudy Instituta sistemnogo analiza Rossijskoj akademii nauk.2018. T.68. Vyp.3. S.69-82.
13. Levit B.YU., Livshic V.N. Nelinejnye setevye transportnye zadachi. M.: «Transport», 1972. 144 s.
14. Vilenskij P.L., Livshic V.N., Smolyak S.A. Ocenka effektivnosti investicionnyh proektov: Teoriya i praktika. 5-oe izd. pererab. i dop. M.: Poli Print Servis, 2015. 1300 s.
15. Roller L.H. Proper quadratic cost functions with an applications to the Bell System // The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1990. 72(2). P.202-210.
16. Pulley L.B., Braunstein Y.M. A composite cost function for multiproduct firms with an application to economies of scope in banking // The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1992. 74(2). P.221-230.
17. Informacionnaya tekhnologiya sinteza slozhnyh setevyh struktur nestacionarnoj rossijskoj ekonomiki: modeli, algoritmy, programmnaya realizaciya/ N.I.Belousova, S.P. Bushanskij, Е.M. Vasil’eva, V.N.Livshic, E.I.Pozamantir //Audit i finansovyj analiz. 2008. Vyp. 1. C.50-88.
18. Livshic V.N., Belousova N.I., Bushanskij S.P., Vasil’eva Е.M., Guk S.N. Analiz dinamiki tekhnologicheskih determinant estestvennomonopol’nyh transportnyh setej pri optimal’nom ih razvitii // Audit i finansovyj analiz. M.: «DSM Press», 2011. Vyp.4. S. 138-159.
19. Еstestvenno-monopol›nye svojstva transportnyh setej: mnogoproduktovye modeli diagnostiki / N.I.Belousova., S.P. Bushanskij, Е.M.Vasil›eva, V.B.Vasil’ev // Audit i finansovyj analiz. 2018. Vyp.2. S.129-147.