Abstract. 

This article describes the problems of database integration. The analysis of methods and approaches to database integration is carried out. The applicability of various approaches to the integration of databases at various levels is considered: at the data level, at the level of program and user interfaces, at the functionalapplication and organizational level, at the level of corporate information systems, at the level of web services. Analyzed modern integrating data models, integration tools and standards that allow the development of data integration systems. The conclusion is made about the importance of data integration in the context of the digitalization of the economy to improve the reliability, competitiveness and efficiency of business processes in the context of the integration of digital interaction of enterprises. It is also concluded that an increase in the efficiency of the economy as a whole is based on the accumulation of data on human capital, since the economic growth and development of the country significantly depend on human capital.

Keywords: 

database integration, metadata, database management systems, digitalization, integration methods, big data, human capital

PP. 59-67.

DOI: 10.14357/20790279200406

 

References

1. William Kent. Solving Domain Mismatch and Schema Mismatch Problems with an Object-Oriented Database Programming Language. Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (1991).

2. Erhard Rahm, Philip A. Bernstein. A Survey of Approaches to Automatic Schema Matching. VLDB JOURNAL (2001).

3. John Miles Smith; et al. (1982). “Multibase: integrating heterogeneous distributed database systems”. AFIPS ‘81 Proceedings of the May 4–7, 1981, National Computer Conference. pp. 487–499.

4. Steven Ruggles, J. David Hacker, and Matthew Sobek (1995). “Order out of Chaos: The Integrated Public Use Microdata Series”. Historical Methods. 28. pp. 33–39.

5. Shubhra S. Ray; et al. (2009). “Combining Multi-Source Information through Functional Annotation based Weighting: Gene Function Prediction in Yeast” (PDF). IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 56 (2): 229–236. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.150.7928. doi: 10.1109/ TBME.2008.2005955. PMID 19272921.

6. Alagić, Suad; Bernstein, Philip A. (2002). Database Programming Languages. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2397. pp. 228–246. doi: 10.1007 / 3-540-46093-4_14. ISBN 978-3-540-44080-2.

7. Jeffrey D. Ullman (1997). “Information Integration Using Logical Views”. ICDT 1997. pp. 19–40.

8. Alon Y. Halevy (2001). “Answering queries using views: A survey” (PDF). The VLDB Journal. pp. 270–294.

9. George Konstantinidis; et al. (2011). “Scalable Query Rewriting: A Graph-based Approach” (PDF). in Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD’11, June 12-16, 2011, Athens, Greece.

10. Kogalovsky M.R. Advanced technologies of information systems [Perspektivnyye tekhnologii informatsionnykh sistem] M.: DMK Press, 2003, 288 p.

11. Tanyansky S.S. Semantic domain model in problems of integration of heterogeneous information systems [Semanticheskaya model’ predmetnoy oblasti v zadachakh integratsii neodnorodnykh informatsionnykh sistem] // Bulletin of KhNTU, 2005, №21, pp. 52-59.

12. Ponamarenko L.A., Tanyansky S.S., Philatov V.A. Integration of information systems with partial display of data models [Integratsiya informatsionnykh sistem pri chastichnom otobrazhenii modeley dannykh] // Problems of a systems approach in economics, 2008, Issue 26, pp. 33-44.

13. Christophides V., Cluet S., Simeon J. Semistructured and structured integration reconciled. http://www.rocq.inria.fr/verso/Jerome.Simeon/YAT/.

14. Lahiri T., Abiteboul S., Widom J. Ozone: Integrating structures and semistructured data.

http://www-db.stanford.edu/pub/papers/ozone.ps.

15. Stonebraker M. et al. Third-Generation DataBase System Manifesto. Proc. IFIP WG 2.6 Conference on Object Oriented Databases, Windermere, England, July 1990.

16. Eisenberg A., Melton J. SQL:1999, formerly known as SQL3 // Open systems. – 1999. - №1. – pp. 52-57.

17. Eisenberg A., Melton J. SQL/XML is Making Good Progress. SIGMOD Record, Vol. 31, No. 2, June 2002.

18. ISO/IEC 9075.14:200x(E). Information technology – Database language – SQL – Part 14: XML Related Specification (SQL/XML). 2001.06.18. Working Draft. http://www.sqlx.org/.

19. Wiederhold G. Mediators in the Architecture of Future Information Systems. IEEE Computer 25:3, pp. 38-49, 1992.

20. Kalinichenko L. A., Briukhov D.O., Skvortsov N.A., Zakharov V.N. Infrastructure of the subject mediating environment aiming at semantic interoperability of heterogeneous digital library collections. Second All-Russian Scientific Conference “Digital Libraries: Advanced Methods and Technologies, Digital Collections”, Protvino, 2000, pp. 78-90.

21. Calvanese D., Giacomo G., Lembo D., Lenzerini M., Rosati R. Conceptual Modeling for Data Integration. http://www.inf.unibz.it/~calvanese/papers/calv-etal-book-mylopoulos-2009.pdf

22. Calvanese D., Giacomo G., Lembo D., Lenzerini M., Rosati R., Ruzzi M. Using OWL in Data Integration. Chapter 14. http://www.dis.uniroma1.it/~rosati/publications/CalvaneseetalSWIMBook-09.pdf