Литература

1. Hull J. Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives. 10th Edition. Canada: Pearson. 2018.

2. Rockafeller T., Uryasev S. Optimization of conditional value - at – risk // The J. Risk. 2000. Vol. 3. P. 21-41.

3. Bollerslev T. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity // Journal of Economet-rics, 1986. Vol. 52. P. 5-59.

4. Elie L., Jeantheau T. Consistency in Heteroskedastic Models // Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 1995. Vol. 320. P. 1255-1258.

5. Duan J. The GARCH Option Pricing Model // Mathematical Finance. 1995.

6. Elliott Robert J., Madan Dilip B. A Discrete Time Equivalent Martingale Measure // Mathematical Finance, 1998. Vol. 8, N 2. P. 127-152.

7. Pearson K. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space // Phil, 1901. P. 559-572.

8. Tilman L., Golub B. Measuring yield curve risk using principal components analysis, value at risk, and key rate durations // The Journal of Portfolio Management, 1997. Vol. 23, N 4. P. 72-84.

9. Specht K., Gohout W. Portfolio selection using the principal components GARCH model // Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 2003. Vol. 17, N 4. P. 450-458.

10. Geng J. Principal Component GARCH Model // SSRN Electronic Journal, 2007.

11. Дубров А.М., Мхитарян В.С., Трошин Л.И. Многомерные статистические методы и основы эконометрики. М.: МЭСИ. 2002.

12. Williams D. Probability with Martingales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1991.

13. Bell D. Transformations of measures on an infinite-dimensional vector space. In: Сinlar. E., Fitzsimmons P.J., Williams R.J. Seminar on Stochastic Processes // Progress in Probability, 1990. Vol. 24. P. 15-25.

14. Yi Xi. Comparison of option pricing between ARMA-GARCH and GARCH-M models. USA: University of Western Ontario. 2013. MoS Thesis.

15. Terasvirta, T. An Introduction to Univariate GARCH Models // Handbook of Financial Time Series, 2009. Vol. 10. P. 17-42.

16. Akgiray V. Conditional Heteroscedasticity in Time Series of Stock Returns: Evidence and Forecasts // The Journal of Business, 1989. Vol. 62, N 1. P. 55-80.

17. Данилишин А.Р., Голембиовский Д.Ю. Риск-нейтральная динамика для ARIMAGARCH модели с ошибками, распределенными по закону SU Джонсона // Информатика и ее применения, 2020. Т. 14, 1. С. 48-55.

18. Bollerslev T. Conditionally heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return // The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1987. Vol. 69, N 3. P. 542-547.

19. Simonato J. GARCH processes with skewed and leptokurtic innovations: Revisiting the Johnson SU case, 2012. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2060994.

20. Phelim P. Options: A Monte Carlo approach // Journal of Financial Economics, 1977. Vol. 4, N 3. P. 323–338.

21. Lopez J. Regulatory evaluation of value-at-risk models // Journal of Risk, 1998. Vol. 1, N 2. P. 37-63.

22. Kupiec P. Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Management Models // The Journal of Derivatives, 1995. Vol. 3, N 2. P. 73-84.